• To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>,"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI* references
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 09:48:23 -0700
• Thread-index: AcJnAhA9uoIt47yATnOEkStA3/+8hgAC+oey
• Thread-topic: namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI* references

+1
 
<me-too>I was about to ask the same question and state the same opinion.</me-too>

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@g...] 
	Sent: Sat 9/28/2002 8:16 AM 
	To: Thomas B. Passin; xml-dev@l... 
	Cc: 
	Subject: RE:  namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI* references
	
	

	> Yes, and then there is this -
	>
	> " QName ::= (Prefix ':')? LocalPart [7]
	> Prefix ::= NCName [8]
	> LocalPart ::= NCName "
	
	How does this affect the value space for the values of namespace
	declarations?
	
	> I agree that as a minimum, this discrepancy should be cleared up, and at
	> best, the Rec should be aligned with the RFC for URIs.
	
	I disagree that it needs to be aligned. IMHO, it is.
	
	--
	<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
	
	
	-----------------------------------------------------------------
	The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
	initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
	
	The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
	
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
	
	

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Design pattern
• Next by thread: RE: namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI* references
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread