• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:21:07 -0600
• In-reply-to: <87it0nzblt.fsf@n...>
• Mail-followup-to: xml-dev@l...
• References: <r01050300-1015-889D57E8D48B11D6857F0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> <87it0nzblt.fsf@n...>
• Reply-to: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• Sender: <mgushee@h...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:27:42PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:

> In any event, I think it's quite a leap from "the TAG thinks HTML
> should use XLink" to "the whole world must use XLink (or some other
> technology)"

Good point! I'm sure the average Ugandan cowherd has no use for HTML,
thus need not be concerned about XLink (or some other technology).

-- 
Matt Gushee
Englewood, Colorado, USA
mgushee@h...
http://www.havenrock.com/

• References:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: RE: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread