Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 10:13 AM, Eric van der Vlist wrote: >> Personally, it's not an interesting solution to me because I want >> links to be manifest even in well-formed documents that don't have a >> W3C XML Schema, let alone documents that use other schema >> technologies. > > I don't want to be nasty, but can't this be interpreted as defining > limits to what the PSVI can be used for and denying its implicit claim > to be generic which was (as far as I can remember since this thread is > becoming difficult to follow) Simon's initial point? I'm 100% with Norm. I want the markup to explicit and self-documenting, as opposed to off in the PSVI which you only compute by fetching another (potentially large & complex) resource and processing it. I have grave concerns about the PSVI in general and its "implicit claims to be generic" in particular. > You want links to be manifest in well formed documents because links > are > obviously important to you but couldn't I want the same for any other > type which is important to me? Yep, but I think links have special importance to the Web and should be manifest in documents used on the Web. -Tim
|
