• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 01:42:37 +0000
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020927200344.02ffec00@n...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020927194520.00bcae40@n...> <r01050300-1015-B0782822D27411D68C880003937A08C2@[192.168.1 24.21]> <5.1.0.14.0.20020927200344.02ffec00@n...>

Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> wrote:

| If I take an integer out of a relational database and give it to a Java 
| program, I would often like the Java program to know that it is an integer. 
| Not just for one XML vocabulary, because I want to write tools that can 
| handle more than one XML vocabulary. What's wrong with that?

Nothing.  No need for heroic spams of invention, either.  Have you looked
into notation declarations?  

• References:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Groves (was re: bunch of other stuff...)
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread