• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:55:12 +0000
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF730@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF730@h...>

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> wrote:

| The current attractor seems to be arch form style remapping vs 
| namespaces with the lakshman rekha being self-descriptive vs 
| augmented documents.  Is that it?

Maybe.  But should Sita be self-descriptive or augmented?

• References:
  • RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by Date: RE: RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by thread: RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread