• To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: Push / pull model
• From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@w...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:05:13 -0400
• Cc: "Lars Marius Garshol" <larsga@g...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200209191702.NAA29780@m...>
• Reply-to: <keith@w...>

But that stack of contexts is implicit in my view.  It's part of the nature
of bottom up parsing, and I don't have to do anything to declare and/or
maintain it.

	Keith


-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:51 PM
To: keith@w...
Cc: John Cowan; Lars Marius Garshol; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  Push / pull model


Keith W. Boone scripsit:
>
> Buttom up parsers do require implicit state; you've got a stack of
contexts
> that you are working with in the parsing tool.

That would be explicit state.  Implicit state is the kind you get by
doing recursive method calls.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
jcowan@r...
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There
are
no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that
they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful. --The
Hobbit

• References:
  • Re: Push / pull model
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Push / pull model
• Next by Date: RE: Microsoft's vision of data and the role of XML in that context
• Previous by thread: Re: Push / pull model
• Next by thread: Re: Push / pull model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread