• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 21:35:14 +0000
• In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020913173001.00c2d330@m...>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B949@HQ5> <4.3.2.7.2.20020913173001.00c2d330@m...>

Ann Navarro <ann@w...> wrote:

| The point of the message is the linking examples, not an ideological 
| argument about application construction.

The lesson from the message is that namespaces and colonification are

  ***   *B* *R* *O* *K* *E* *N*   ***

The pope and his nuncio, of course, aren't listening.  And so WGs are
caught in the toils of a disaster not of their own making.
 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration languages]
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Next by Date: RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Previous by thread: RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread