• To: XML-DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: xml schema
• From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
• Date: 03 Sep 2002 09:29:21 +0100
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A971D2@r...>
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A971D2@r...>

On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 15:34, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Many statements in his article indicate his bias[0]. What more do you
> want, a point by point rebuttal in a counter-article on XML.com? 

While I think that XML.com gives enough air-time to articles showing
many 'conventional' and innovative approaches to WXS, something you are
helping me with, there is always the comment facility at the bottom of
the article in which you can make your objections public.

Thoughtful and lively debate has always been something XML.com welcomes.

-- Edd

This is a digitally signed message part

• References:
  • RE: xml schema
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Client-side sorting without Microsoft extensions?
• Next by Date: is xml schema bad wrt schema extensions?
• Previous by thread: RE: xml schema
• Next by thread: RE: xml schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread