• To: dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo)
• Subject: Re: what is correct way to express a type as CDATA in XML schema
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:39:38 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: pfuhlman@D... (Phil Fuhlman), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A97204@r...> from "Dare Obasanjo" at Sep 09, 2002 10:29:16 AM

Dare Obasanjo scripsit:

> I believe 0x09 should be an invalid XML character regardless of whether it is in typed as CDATA (or in a CDATA section) or not. 

Why?

Of course, a CDATA section affects only the interpretation of markup:
"<" and "&" and "]]>".

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
       --_Specht v. Netscape_

• References:
  • RE: what is correct way to express a type as CDATA in XML schema
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Shouldn't colon be reserved?
• Next by Date: RE: what is correct way to express a type as CDATA in XML schema
• Previous by thread: RE: what is correct way to express a type as CDATA in XML schema
• Next by thread: RE: what is correct way to express a type as CDATA in XML schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread