• To: "Edd Dumbill" <edd@u...>,"XML-DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: xml schema
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:58:12 -0700
• Thread-index: AcJTJCIkDWTQJruZQcK01YxESyNEZAAPkdhA
• Thread-topic: xml schema

I would have commented but given that the article is over a year old, it
is unlikely that any debate will ensue. If XML.com is interested in an
article revisiting Kohsuke Kawaguchi's points you can email me offlist. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Old cars never die, they just smell that way.     

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edd Dumbill [mailto:edd@u...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:29 AM
> To: XML-DEV
> 
> On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 15:34, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> > Many statements in his article indicate his bias[0]. What 
> more do you 
> > want, a point by point rebuttal in a counter-article on XML.com?
> 
> While I think that XML.com gives enough air-time to articles 
> showing many 'conventional' and innovative approaches to WXS, 
> something you are helping me with, there is always the 
> comment facility at the bottom of the article in which you 
> can make your objections public.
> 
> Thoughtful and lively debate has always been something 
> XML.com welcomes.
> 
> -- Edd
> 

• Prev by Date: RE: how to subscribe this maillist?
• Next by Date: RE: xml schema
• Previous by thread: RE: xml schema
• Next by thread: RE: xml schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread