• To: Jeff Greif <jgreif@a...>
• Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (wasRe: TAG on HLink)
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:48:30 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <11d101c2667f$7af71c90$6400a8c0@JMG>

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Jeff Greif wrote:

> You can imagine a single
> piece of code acting as the guts of a client that can access any web service
> described by WSDL.

Without any knowledge of the operation's semantics?  Such a thing will 
only be useful as a debugging tool.

(The BBN Cronus distributed system, a research project, had this in 1988; 
Corba had it's DII (dynamic invocation interface) in the early 90's.  The 
fun thing about this WS stuff is that it's not all that new... :)
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (wasRe: TAG on HLink)
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• References:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread