• To: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: TAG on HLink
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:05:31 -0700
• In-reply-to: <ql29pu8n9kqclnm1tu70mb82777rolfk8m@4...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020927085155.00aca4d8@m...><5.1.0.14.0.20020926150135.00ac88a8@m...><Pine.LNX.4.30.0209271134050.7498-100000@g... c.uk><5.1.0.14.0.20020927085155.00aca4d8@m...>

At 04:52 PM 9/27/2002 +0000, Arjun Ray wrote:

>It sounds like you're saying that XLink wound up with no (re)mapping
>mechanism because there was no way found to appease prejudice.  Have I
>understood this correctly?

Pretty much -- solutions that would have met our requirements were 
dismissed as 'un-elegant'.

Ann

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: TAG on HLink
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: TAG on HLink
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
  • Re: TAG on HLink
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
  • Re: TAG on HLink
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by Date: Re: TAG on HLink
• Previous by thread: Re: TAG on HLink
• Next by thread: Re: TAG on HLink
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread