• To: "Arjun Ray" <aray@n...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:29:12 -0700
• Thread-index: AcJkc3UxgTkSfZ5+Q62vFiR8TU0UvwAPL/gg
• Thread-topic: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arjun Ray [mailto:aray@n...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:07 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> 
> "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...> wrote:
> 
> | The implementation seems reasonable (ignoring the bug Dare pointed 
> | out),
> 
> But how can it be a bug?  The implementors will probably tell 
> you it's a feature.  If needed, they might klonk you over the 
> head with the word that slays all arguments: Performance!


It's hard to take your posts seriously when you make such incoherrent
statements. It's a bug. It's in our bug database. The person who sits in
the office across from mine who currently owns our XML parsers agrees
its a bug. The person who originally wrote the code agrees its a bug.
The person who designed the API agrees it's a bug. 

Somehow we are all lying and you who have nothing to do with the design,
implementation or documentation of the API *knows* it is by design. 

*sigh* 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Self-made people have an abundance of working parts.        

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: parser models
• Next by Date: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Previous by thread: RE: Turn off the Filters (WAS RE: [Off-Topic] Who/What is f lowserve.com? (A Report to Sender Bogosity))
• Next by thread: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread