• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:12:12 -0700
• In-reply-to: <200209222008.g8MK8v311939@d...>
• References: <200209222008.g8MK8v311939@d...> <200209212046.49909.miles@m...> <00a901c2618d$a322b900$0400a8c0@gandalf> <p04330106b9b25d8bd05b@[192.168.254.4]>

> Miles Sabin wrote:
> > So maybe the answer would be to come up with a template string syntax
> > that's more idiomatic for XML than printf style. [...]

to which I replied:

> Well, if you insist on using a Java-like language to process XML,
> that's probably the best way out :-)

but I have to take that back after reading subseqent
messages on the thread :-)

In particular, Arjun Ray's idea to have element constructors
take a sequence of child nodes as input and return mutable
references looks promising; you can eliminate a lot of local
variables and make the plumbing more tractable that way.


(Still, I'll stick with Tcl and Haskell for now...)


--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• References:
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Next by Date: More on integrating XML and programming languages
• Previous by thread: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Next by thread: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread