• To: 'Miles Sabin' <miles@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:50:23 -0500

It could be.  Generally, something that is simpler 
and easier to explain has a way of winning in an 
ecology of competing codes.

Let's see where the community takes this.  In a 
world in which the leaders still haven't figured 
out that URI == RESOURCE is a claim to have solved 
Schroedinger's Equation for the web, I am always 
glad to see a simplifying assumption.

len


From: Miles Sabin [mailto:miles@m...]

Yeah, it's a bit cleaner, a bit more idiomatic for Java ... but is that enough?

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Next by Date: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Previous by thread: RE: Is there a difference that makes a difference betwe en topic maps and named queries?
• Next by thread: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread