• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: SAX is not a read-only API (wa RE: re: XML SIG 17...)
• From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:00:10 -0600
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <p04330100b9a6852be805@[192.168.254.4]>

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

...
> >ch.startDocument();
> >// document content goes here...
> >Ch.endDocument();
> 
> This is interesting, but you still need a class that implements the
> ContentHandler that is not part of SAX. You cannot write an XML
> document without adding your own non-standard, XML classes.

Sure, just like you need a class that implements XMLReader on the
reading side. I think it's clear that we have different definitions for
"API". I consider the SAX interface definitions the "API", where you
seem to define it as the implementation (and entire packaging) of those
interfaces.

-aaron

......................................................
. Aaron Skonnard, DevelopMentor (http://skonnard.com).
.  Essential XML Quick Reference available online!   .
.    Download PDFs: http://www.develop.com/books     .
......................................................

• References:
  • Re: SAX is not a read-only API (wa RE: re: XML SIG17...)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX is not a read-only API (wa RE: re: XML SIG 17...)
• Next by Date: Pretty Print for schema's
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX is not a read-only API (wa RE: re: XML SIG17...)
• Next by thread: Re: SAX is not a read-only API (wa RE: re: XML SIG 17...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread