• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Datatypes - it's in the contract
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 06:02:25 +0000
• In-reply-to: <200209290558.BAA09719@m...>
• References: <48225068110.20020929063712@j...> <200209290558.BAA09719@m...>

John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote:
| Jeni Tennison scripsit:

|> I gather that you couldn't use notations to specify the type of
|> attributes?
| 
| Not any way I know of.

Not in XML.  But it's possible in SGML, using the DATA declared value.

  <!ATTLIST foo
            bar  DATA baz  #IMPLIED
            >

where the DATA keyword is followed by the name of a declared notation.  

• References:
  • Re: Datatypes - it's in the contract
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: Datatypes - it's in the contract
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: Datatypes - it's in the contract
• Next by thread: Notations for datatypes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread