• To: uche.ogbuji@f... (Uche Ogbuji)
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 19:45:52 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jeni@j... (Jeni Tennison), jonathan.robie@d... (Jonathan Robie), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E17vQax-0006UA-00@m...> from "Uche Ogbuji" at Sep 28, 2002 05:01:34 PM

Uche Ogbuji scripsit:

> I was a bit careless with my example.  expanded-name() would probably return a 
> string, which could be the namespace then the local name separated by a 
> character illegal in URI (note that the NS 1.1. discussion casts a cloud over 
> this)

A better approach would be a local-name followed by some ASCII delimiter
followed by the namespace name, for that very reason.  It's not like
you are very likely to sort on them or anything; you just want to compare
them for equality.

-- 
John Cowan                                jcowan@r...
At times of peril or dubitation,          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Perform swift circular ambulation,        http://www.reutershealth.com
With loud and high-pitched ululation.

• References:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: Datatypes - it's in the contract
• Previous by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread