Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote: [Eric van der Vlist:] |> On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 01:07, Arjun Ray wrote: | |>> AFAICS, a parser should cover everything in the infoset. | | Note that what got into the infoset was a purely arbitrary choice | by yours truly, with an eye to SAX, DOM (much diminished later) and | XPath. There is nothing normative about the selections, How mutable is the spec, then? | and saying "but it's in the infoset!" is no sort of reason why a | parser ought to support something. Infoset conformance depends on | documenting what you in fact do support, neither more nor less. Yes, but in what terms is the documentation expressed? Is there an "infoset-speak" behind the scenes? |> infortunate that there is no XML serialization of the XML infoset (and | | The serialization of the XML Infoset is XML. But not necessarily the original document, right?
|
