• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 00:42:47 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-20A82E18D26711D685CC0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Sep 27, 2002 06:19:02 PM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> Then perhaps the Joe/Jane Website argument shouldn't be used against
> improvements to the XHTML 'standards'...

My point exactly!  All arguments of the form "Joe/Jane Website won't
be able to cope with (namespace prefixes | XLink semantics | whatever)"
are ipso facto bogus.

-- 
Business before pleasure, if not too bloomering long before.
        --Nicholas van Rijn
                John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
                        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan  http://www.reutershealth.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Rethinking namespaces,attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread