[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Arjun Ray scripsit:

> If the recursive descent pattern and explicit procedural coding appeal to
> you, yes, sure.  I don't particularly care for either - especially, the
> former in application code - mainly because of the "typed constant" or
> similar device intruding into the code (as Bill de Hora explained a while
> back): I find the while( event ) { switch( type ) { } } structure, which
> inevitably appears, more than a little clumsy.  

I don't understand what this control structure has to do with recursive
descent: I rarely if ever see such a thing.  Can you exemplify?

-- 
John Cowan    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan   <jcowan@r...>
    "Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context. A telegram
    that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
    5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
    as any, even sans digital signature." --me

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member