• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 21:20:06 +0000
• In-reply-to: <200209202115.g8KLF6330284@d...>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B986@HQ5> <200209202115.g8KLF6330284@d...>

Joe English <jenglish@f...> wrote:

| There were and are plenty of language-specific APIs for SGML/XML 
| processing, and none of them need to interoperate with each other. 
| This isn't something that the W3C needs to standardize IMO.

I agree.  The formlization of an infoset spec is not only enough, it makes
DOM irrelevant.

Grove plans, anyone?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: Hundred Flowers (WAS: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS:
• Next by Date: Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Previous by thread: Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Next by thread: Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread