• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Top 10 commercial XML vocabularies?
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:22:43 -0700
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020910122506.03d4e8e8@n...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020910122506.03d4e8e8@n...> <5.1.0.14.0.20020910113204.03d460b8@n...>

Jonathan Robie wrote:

> Turning to banking, there is only one vocabulary listed, OFX:
> [...]
> Can anybody tell me the status of OFX? There is a press release saying over
> 1000 companies adopted it, in January 2001, and Checkfree, Intuit, and
> Microsoft all said they would use it. Is this an example of a successful,
> widespread business vocabulary, or did it turn out to be hype? I suspect
> that this one is for real, but I don't have any hard data to make me
> confident that this is the case.


Quicken and Microsoft Money both use OFX; I've personally
seen it "in the wild" on my credit card's and bank's websites.

(The original OFX spec was SGML-based, BTW.  It's been around
and in use for a while.)


--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• References:
  • RE: Top 10 commercial XML vocabularies?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • RE: Top 10 commercial XML vocabularies?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: SGML queries
• Next by Date: RE: Subtyping in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Top 10 commercial XML vocabularies?
• Next by thread: Re: Top 10 commercial XML vocabularies?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread