Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 01:46 PM 9/30/2002 +0100, Jeni Tennison wrote: >I think, from the adversarial way in which you put your questions, >that you've jumped to some unwarranted conclusions about my >motivations for exploring how DTDs could declare W3C XML Schema data >types. Hi Jenni, I want to absorb what you said and think a bit before I respond to the technical content, but I also want to respond to this. I had not intended to come across as adversarial, and I apologize if my tone struck you that way. I was basically tossing off the first set of questions that occurred to me - I haven't spent enough time examining this design to have an opinion one way or another, I just thought these were questions that would be important in exploring it. I also had no idea one way or another about your motivations, and had not drawn any conclusions, but it's interesting to hear your fuller description. Exploring design spaces is a good thing, not a bad thing. Jonathan
|
