• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: TAG on HLink
• From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>
• Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:39:06 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <r01050300-1015-A464A8DED0EA11D6B29D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Reply-to: pdurusau@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914

Simon,

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

>The W3C TAG appears to have decided to inflict XLink on everyone, like
>it or not:
>
Not trying to start a religious war but what do you find offensive about 
XLink? (Assuming you don't use the term "inflict" to refer to visits 
from close friends? ;-)

(My only disappointment has been poor support. I could speculate on why 
vendors have not supported it but suspect that would rapidly degenerate 
into the sort of name calling that we all enjoyed earlier this week on 
the list.)

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
pdurusau@e...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: TAG on HLink
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • TAG on HLink
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: Fwd: War of Attrition (was: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial))
• Next by Date: Re: Web Services - what is the alternative? (was TAG on HLink)
• Previous by thread: TAG on HLink
• Next by thread: Re: TAG on HLink
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread