• To: amyzing@t... (Amelia A Lewis)
• Subject: Re: parser models
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 05:59:12 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1032841930.932.77.camel@marajen> from "Amelia A Lewis" at Sep 24, 2002 12:32:10 AM

Amelia A Lewis scripsit:

> To the best of my knowledge, there are no public lexical (editor) APIs. 
> Building a lexical API on top of a syntactic one is ... backwards.  It
> is perfectly easy to imagine, for instance, LAX: the lexical API for
> XML.  This would have different sorts of events, though.  

The partial lexical API I am building has the following events:
aname, aval, entity, eof, etag, gi, pcdata, pi, stagc.  If this were
to be standardized, it would require comment, cdata, and tagws for sure,
perhaps others.

-- 
John Cowan                                <jcowan@r...>     
http://www.reutershealth.com              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Yakka foob mog.  Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork.  Chumble spuzz.
    -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"

• References:
  • Re: parser models
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: DOCTYPE declaration in the document prolog
• Next by Date: Re: parser models
• Previous by thread: Re: parser models
• Next by thread: Re: parser models
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread