[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


At 02:09 PM 9/17/2002 -0400, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>At 1:13 PM -0700 9/17/02, Ann Navarro wrote:
>
>>XHTML 2.0 is an XML application, and is not going to be based upon an 
>>assumed arcane knowledge of it's semantics, or a requirement for 
>>hard-wired DTDs. Let's stop that assumption quickly.
>
>
>The why define XHTML 2.0 at all? Why not just use raw XML?

Why use any agreed upon XML vocabulary? Why not just use raw XML all the time?

Ann


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member