Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> At 09:35 PM 9/13/2002 +0000, Arjun Ray wrote: > >Ann Navarro <ann@w...> wrote: > > > >| The point of the message is the linking examples, not an ideological > >| argument about application construction. > > > >The lesson from the message is that namespaces and colonification are > > > > *** *B* *R* *O* *K* *E* *N* *** > > > >The pope and his nuncio, of course, aren't listening. And so WGs are > >caught in the toils of a disaster not of their own making. > > > Exactly. > > We're rowing with the oars that we have. Until decisions are made to fix > other things, we have no choice but to keep toiling. See TAG and Namespaces > 1.1 Last Call to fix that situation. The HTML WG is contradicting itself. You seem to be claiming that you have no mandate to develop an AF-like solution. If so, how is it that you have a mandate to create something with as much wheel-reinvention as HLink? As I see it, if you are authorized to develop HLink, then you are authorized to develop it rightly. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com Apache 2.0 API - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-apache/ Basic XML and RDF techniques for knowledge management, Part 7 - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think12.html Keeping pace with James Clark - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/libra ry/x-jclark.html
|
