Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> That's a bit of a strawman, IMHO. It may have been the intent of the WG to > produce OO in XML I've never confused XML Schema complex types with objects (although I may have had past cranial emissions of that nature). The above statement does not exhibit such confusion, though: it only speculates on the thought processes of the WG, which ht has been kind enough to clarify. I don't see that his statements confuse objects with data, either, BTW. However, I have seen complex types mapped to objects. There are similarities in their mechanisms for inheritance. Whether such similarities are enough to justify attempts at data binding is subjective, although I sense a tidal shift away from such efforts. But you know how tides are...
|
