• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:13:17 -0400
• In-reply-to: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C106028D9F@r...>

> > I still fail to see any merit whatsoever in the counterexamples
> > you've provided.
> 
> Are you saying that *you* would never want to use this feature, or
> that *nobody* would ever want to use this feature? 

To put it bluntly, I'm saying that NO ONE EVER SHOULD CREATE MARKUP
WHICH FOLLOWS THIS PATTERN:

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org"
about="http://www.w3.org/not/really/I'm/just/kidding/">

And I'm stunned by the amount of brainpower that seems to be attempting
to justify it.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• Next by Date: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread