• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 21:05:29 -0700
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B6BC@HQ5>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020610

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> A URzed is always dereferenceable.  If we accept that, then

We don't.  There is no supporting de jure evidence for this proposition, 
and many counterexamples that one encounters daily.  Thus the rest of 
your arguments are uninteresting until they find some base in the real 
world.  I suspect I may agree with the conclusion you're heading 
towards, but you'll have to find another way to get there. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• References:
  • RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• Next by Date: Re: The version number in XML documents
• Previous by thread: RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• Next by thread: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread