• To: bob@w...
• Subject: Re: Quick Xpath
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:30:09 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020717185306.21107C-100000@e...>(message from bob mcwhirter on Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:54:26 -0400 (EDT))
• References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020717185306.21107C-100000@e...>

> Technically, I think we're compliant, but it sure can annoy the user. ;)

If an XPath user can tell the internal order in which your
implementation stores the node set then you can't be compliant.
If you are accessing the structure from some other API then 
probably you are right that it is out of scope for XPath.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • RE: Quick Xpath
    • From: bob mcwhirter <bob@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Quick Xpath
• Next by Date: Re: Quick Xpath
• Previous by thread: Re: Quick Xpath
• Next by thread: Re: Quick Xpath
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread