• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: The general XML processing problem
• From: Mike Brown <mike@s...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:39:21 -0600 (MDT)
• In-reply-to: <3D32FFCA.34DABC2E@f...> "from W. E. Perry at Jul 15, 200201:00:58 pm"

W. E. Perry wrote:
> It is heretical, if it presumes enough a priori knowledge of process XYZ to
> be comfortable instructing that process in the execution of its own
> functions.

Amen, but where were you all when I was getting roasted alive over this very
issue on xsl-list a few weeks ago? :)

  http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200206/msg01182.html
  (and just keep clicking on Thread Next till you get to my sour grapes at
  http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200206/msg01342.html )

   - Mike
____________________________________________________________________________
  mike j. brown                   |  xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/
  denver/boulder, colorado, usa   |  resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/

• References:
  • Re: The general XML processing problem
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: generating DOM from ill-formed HTML docs
• Next by Date: Re: XPointer and XML Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: The general XML processing problem
• Next by thread: performance comparison
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread