• To: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@a...>
• Subject: Re: Fine namespace control in XML Schema
• From: Daniel Prager <danielp@d...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:00:10 +1000
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Organization: Deakin University
• References: <3D2CF3EF.6CFAD59E@d...> <3D2D03AB.7010407@a...>

Hi Eddie

Thanks -- this is certainly getting close to what I would ideally like.

Your 3 schemas are a great step forward, but they do admit a false
positive (taking the RELAX NG definition as canonical) by passing
the following document as valid:

<a:frog xmlns:a="http://www.example.com/a">
 <name> Spotted tree frog </name>
 <colour> Blue with red spots </colour>
 <leap> minimal </leap>
</a:frog>

Great step forward; can you (or anyone) do even better?


Thanks again

Daniel

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fine namespace control in XML Schema
    • From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@a...>

• References:
  • Fine namespace control in XML Schema
    • From: Daniel Prager <danielp@d...>
  • Re: Fine namespace control in XML Schema
    • From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fine namespace control in XML Schema
• Next by Date: HashMap in an XML document
• Previous by thread: Re: Fine namespace control in XML Schema
• Next by thread: Re: Fine namespace control in XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread