• To: elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold)
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan), xml-dev@l..., xml-editor@w...
• In-reply-to: <p04330106b9645fb9118f@[192.168.254.4]> from "Elliotte Rusty Harold" at Jul 24, 2002 10:46:26 AM

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> That's simply not true. The CR/LF line ending convention is 
> established in many completely platform and vendor independent IETF 
> protocols such as HTTP.

Fair enough.  Although the LF line ending is established in Posix.

-- 
John Cowan    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan   <jcowan@r...>
    "Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context. A telegram
    that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
    5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
    as any, even sans digital signature." --me

• References:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by Date: RE: W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread