• Subject: Re: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresomeother standard that should be looked at
• From: heikki@n... (Heikki Toivonen)
• Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 13:36:00 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <D0F1529EE943B3449F755CA1A40887465B3FD2@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020627 Netscape/7.0

Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer wrote:

>>    
>>
>implemented right there. Mozilla is just not there yet but very close.
>I do think we are getting there...
> 
> 
>[1] http://webaccess.mozquito.com/features/index.xml
>  
>
Your site above reports a wrong mime type for the CSS stylesheet 
(text/html), which is why it is not applied by Mozilla. Change that to 
text/css. Also it seems like Mozilla for some reason applies the 
alternate XSLT stylesheet as well, so you should remove the second 
xml-stylesheet processing instruction to see it work in Mozilla (I just 
filed a bug on this to get it fixed in Mozilla's side).

There are also some bugs in your XSLT stylesheet (might work in IE, 
haven't tested).

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

• References:
  • RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresome other standard that should be looked at
    • From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Help creating DTD
• Next by Date: RE: Help creating DTD
• Previous by thread: RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead,istheresome other standard that should be looked at
• Next by thread: RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead,istheresome other standard that should be looked at
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread