• To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>,"Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>,"J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>
• Subject: RE: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
• From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:42:33 +0300
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcIn/NK4aErBhMPUTze+KZiAiNX44QAAM1yg
• Thread-topic: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)

> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@g...] 
> 
> > From: Manos Batsis [mailto:m.batsis@b...]

> > Because IE behaves quite differently based on whether it 
> anticipates the
> > document as XML or HTML.
> 
> Sure. But what you describe is the effect of IE working in 
> two different
> "modes", XML and HTML (which sadly tries to handle XHTML as 
> well). But the
> fact that the XML parser is external is irrelevant, I'd say...

My impression is that the two "modes" are so deeply separated due to the
*nature* of the msxml component, not just the fact that it is external. 

Manos

• Prev by Date: RE: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
• Next by Date: question: can anyone give me a reason why OWL should have datatypes?
• Previous by thread: RE: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
• Next by thread: Test
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread