• To: Robert Mena <rt_mena@y...>
• Subject: Re: generating DOM from ill-formed HTML docs
• From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:11:44 +0200
• Cc: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20020716021900.12429.qmail@w...>
• Organization: Eternia Pub. Inc.
• References: <000c01c22bae$84fad490$fe193044@tbp1> <20020716021900.12429.qmail@w...>

* Robert Mena wrote:
>Thanks.  I've tested both tools and so far neko
>outperforms tidy in all aspects besides performance.
>Some "popular" sites such as amazon were rejected by
>tidy but went ok with neko.

You may use the --force-output boolean switch to get your
output even if Tidy finds errors (in which Tidy does not
output a pretty-printed version). Rejection happens because
Tidy cannot be sure in order how to fix a certain error.

Note that there is a Library branch in the Tidy CVS repository
that allows to use Tidy more easily from within your program,
but also note that this is somewhat of a pre-alpha version of
the code.

regards.

• References:
  • Re: generating DOM from ill-formed HTML docs
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: generating DOM from ill-formed HTML docs
    • From: Robert Mena <rt_mena@y...>

• Prev by Date: RE: URIs and Names on the Web
• Next by Date: Re: Quick Xpath
• Previous by thread: Re: generating DOM from ill-formed HTML docs
• Next by thread: Re: generating DOM from ill-formed HTML docs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread