• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 08:01:53 -0700
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B6AD@HQ5>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B6AD@HQ5>

Bullard, Claude L wrote:

> It is not healthy to be an ostrich among the coyotes.
>
> Is or is not a URI dereferenceable?  If you say,
> it depends, you have your head in the sand.

I would say that a URL is dereferencable, unequivocably.
It locates a resource.

But URLs are out of fashion.  The current mode
is to Identify resources, not Locate them.  URIs are
used in several W3C specs -- RDF and XMLNS being the
most prominent -- as opaque, atomic identifiers
that have no semantics other than identity.

If you say that a URI must be dereferencable just
because it looks like a URL, then you haven't been
paying attention.


--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• References:
  • RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: FW: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
• Next by Date: RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
• Previous by thread: RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
• Next by thread: RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread