• To: 'Uche Ogbuji' <uche.ogbuji@f...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:20:27 -0500

Are these statements consistent?

"...XML 1.0/XML Namespaces/XML Infoset/XML Base can be integrated without an unreasonable amount of work and that the integration will result in something significantly more coherent than what we have now."

"...the key lesson is that the lowest layers should deal only with syntax and should be semantically neutral."

len


From: Uche Ogbuji [mailto:uche.ogbuji@f...]

The interview was actually conducted several months ago.  There were some 
editorial delays.  I think it's still timely.

http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-jclark.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPointer and XML Schema
• Next by Date: DTD ID REF
• Previous by thread: XML and 3D
• Next by thread: RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread