• To: vdv@d...
• Subject: Re: Quick Xpath
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:20:20 +0100
• Cc: garland_foster@s..., mfeblowitz@f..., dareo@m..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1026941881.19732.399.camel@ibook> (message from Eric van derVlist on 17 Jul 2002 23:38:01 +0200)
• References: <4DBDB4044ABED31183C000508BA0E97F040ABDAA@f...> <008501c22dd9$06de99c0$c000a8c0@salutia> <1026941881.19732.399.camel@ibook>

> (preceding-sibling returns the nodes by document order)

not within that step it doesn't.
[1] is what you want, not last().

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • RE: Quick Xpath
    • From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@f...>
  • Re: Quick Xpath
    • From: "Garland foster" <garland_foster@s...>
  • Re: Quick Xpath
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Quick Xpath
• Next by Date: Re: Quick Xpath
• Previous by thread: Re: Quick Xpath
• Next by thread: Re: Quick Xpath
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread