Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Walter Perry wrote: > > But my question was whether (and if so, why) we could reasonably expect a > discernible difference in the semantic outcome from processing a particular > instance of a single given attribute in no namespace as if it were 'in the > namespace' of the element which it modifies. > As a followup on my last response: One may assign a different range of interpretations to a given namespace qualified element with an attribute depending on whether the attribute is: a) not qualified (no prefix) b) qualified with the namespace name of the element c) qualified with any other individual namespace name This does not mean that one is _required_ to assign _a different_ interpretation to each of the above cases, rather it means that one _is not required_ to assign _the same_ interpretation to each of the above cases. The distinction is important. Jonathan
|
