• To: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Subject: Re: Un-ask the question (was Re: URIs and Names on the Web)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:55:43 -0400
• Cc: Mike Champion <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20020729094300.F10551@w...>

Mark Baker wrote:
> Repeat after me; URLs are nothing more than URIs with a resolution
> mechanism.  

And repeat after me: "Every day in every way I'm getting better and
better."

Neither repetition does much to change the underlying reality.
Expectations for URLs regarding their nature as locators remain whether
or not they're called URIs.  "with a resolution mechanism" changes the
rules of the game irrevocably.

As to whether you're "getting better and better", that is hopefully the
case but likely has nothing to do with repeating the Coue mantra.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Re: Un-ask the question (was Re: URIs and Names on the Web)
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: On Schemas, Namespaces and Syntax vs. Semantics (long but worth it) :)
• Next by Date: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: RE: Un-ask the question (was Re: URIs and Names on the Web)
• Next by thread: Re: Un-ask the question (was Re: URIs and Nameson the Web)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread