• To: elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold)
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:18:23 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., xml-editor@w...
• In-reply-to: <p04330105b963472c981a@[192.168.254.4]> from "Elliotte Rusty Harold" at Jul 23, 2002 01:51:54 PM

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> Note: I do not believe there is *ANY* need for allowing NEL in white 
> space. Any document that uses this can easily be rewritten in an XML 
> 1.0 compliant way with carriage returns and linefeeds. Any competent 
> developer with the slightest concern for interoperability or longterm 
> storage will do this anyway, even if XML 1.1 allows NEL.

That means that on mainframe platforms, XML files are not plaintext files
and vice versa.  As a matter of justice, this is intolerable.

-- 
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML IDE: What are the top 3 and why?
• Next by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread