• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:49:54 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <200207312334.AAA15353@p...>

If you think unqualified attributes being in "no namespace" is a mistake, 
then it's far better to break such documents than to change what they 
mean. In that way it's a compromise.

If you disagree with Simon and think the current system is okay, then 
you'd be opposed to any change, as your note implies.
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CSS XSL Tranformation
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread