• To: ricko@a...
• Subject: Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 15:41:51 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <007001c22fad$2d2ff300$4bc8a8c0@A...>(ricko@a...)
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621DF6@r...> <200207191727.SAA29932@p...> <007001c22fad$2d2ff300$4bc8a8c0@A...>

> A namespace is not a language, nor does it define a language. A schema
> specifies (parts of) the language.  

agreed but if one language uses elements from one namespace,and one uses
elements from another namespace, then irrespective of the definitions of
the language in schema you already know that the two languages have
nothing in common. It's hard to see how you can call such a pair
versions of the same language.

David


_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace
• Next by Date: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• Previous by thread: Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• Next by thread: Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation,and Schema V ersioning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread