• To: vdv@d...
• Subject: Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema Versioning
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:59:29 +0100
• Cc: mfeblowitz@f..., kpako@y..., jeni@j..., xml-dev@l..., duane.krahn@i..., Satish.Ramanathan@m..., awarren@o..., kkanaskie@l..., mrowell@o...
• In-reply-to: <1027010258.23054.208.camel@ibook> (message from Eric van derVlist on 18 Jul 2002 18:37:38 +0200)
• References: <4DBDB4044ABED31183C000508BA0E97F040ABDC0@f...> <1027010258.23054.208.camel@ibook>

The W3C policy is in fact 

http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri

which probably make's Dare happier than the spin I put on it:-)

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
    • From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@f...>
  • RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema Versioning
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• Next by Date: Re: What kind of trap is XPointer?
• Previous by thread: RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema Versioning
• Next by thread: RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread