[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Simon wrote: > In practice, I think the way around this is to encourage people > to treat attributes with no namespace as if they had the same > namespace as their element. That doesn't have to mean a simple > reassignment, though it's certainly possible: > <http://simonstl.com/ns/namespaces/attributes/> How is what you're saying different than the semantics implied by local scoping of elements/attributes (as defined in XSD)? If you assume local scoping, you're treating them as members of a namespace qualified node. -aaron http://staff.develop.com/aarons
|

Cart



