• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Borland C++ and Expat - performance hit.
• From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:37:50 -0400
• Cc: <expat-discuss@l...>
• References: <005f01c2377e$451e3610$0201a8c0@s...>

> Hello,
> 
> I've been testing an application that uses EXPAT on a clean install of
> Windows XP. It was working perfectly well, and EXPAT in particular was
> extremely fast. After I loaded Borland C++ Builder 5 onto the system the
> performance of EXPAT was greatly reduced.
> 
> I've now un-installed C++ Builder, but the performance of EXPAT has not
> returned to what it originally was.
> 
> I think it's fairly obvious that C++ Builder has replaced a system library
> module with a debug version or something like that.

Did you build the Expat Dll with C++ Builder?
The Dll itself only depends on kernel32.dll.

> Before I start digging to find out which libraries are involved I though I
> would ask in this list whether anybody has already figured this out.

Maybe you should direct your question to one of
the Expat mailing lists at http://www.libexpat.org.
Build support for C++ Builder was recently added,
but it seems to default to a debug build.

Karl

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Borland C++ and Expat - performance hit.
    • From: "Stephen Graham" <sg3@b...>

• References:
  • Borland C++ and Expat - performance hit.
    • From: "Stephen Graham" <sg3@b...>

• Prev by Date: Borland C++ and Expat - performance hit.
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: Borland C++ and Expat - performance hit.
• Next by thread: RE: Borland C++ and Expat - performance hit.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread