• To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@i...>,"'John Cowan'" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: URI indigestion
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:53:52 +0100
• Cc: <dareo@m...>,<mc@x...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B6E4@HQ5>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] 
>
> 
> What would be the impact on RDF if it used these 
> instead of URIs?

None, if we forget for a moment that RDF specifies URIs. Today,
urn:publicid: works fine for RDF, so do tag: URIs. 

regards,
Bill de hÓra

..
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• References:
  • RE: URI indigestion
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
• Next by Date: Re: URI indigestion
• Previous by thread: RE: URI indigestion
• Next by thread: Re: URI indigestion
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread